Marginality In The Socio-Philosophical And Juridical Dimensions: The Experience Of An Interdisciplinary Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i34.1164Palabras clave:
marginality, marginal, marginal personality, alienation, destructivenessResumen
This article is devoted to the problem of social marginality, considered in the research key of social philosophy and the general theory of law. In recent decades, the socio-cultural reality has been significantly transformed: in the life of modern society penetrated the latest information technologies that have arisen due to the rapid development of electronics, in addition, there was the formation and spread of a new type of attitude and worldview, which was conceptualized in the philosophical, cultural, religious and other practices of globalizing space today. The epistemic field that exists between the two disciplinary practices (theory of law and social philosophy) allows us to see marginalization as an epiphenomenon of transformations of modern society.
The authors begin their theoretical and applied study of marginality with a comprehensive study of its generic property, i.e. with a study of marginality as such. In this paper, we analyze the semantic and etymological meanings of marginality, consider a wide range of philosophical, sociological and historiographic issues, legal aspects that explain the generic properties of marginality, which allows, in the authors' opinion, to identify the essential and cognitive aspects of this phenomenon, to establish a causal complex of mutual influence marginality on the state of social order as well as offense, and vice versa
Citas
Agara, T. (2017). The Role of Woman in Terrorism and Investigation of Gendering Terrorism. Journal of Humanities Insights, 01(02), 46-56.
Bachinin, V. A. (2006). Encyclopedia of philosophy and sociology of law. St. Petersburg.
Bakulina, L. T., & Stepanenko, R. F. (2016). A review of the materials of the III All-Russian Round Table on general theoretical problems of law "Modern Trends in the Evolution of the Methodology of Legal Research". Law and state: theory and practice,7(139).
Bulyko, A. N. (2008). A large dictionary of foreign words. 35 thousand words. - M.: “Martin”, 703 p.
da Mota Silveira, H., & Martini, L. C. (2017). How the New Approaches on Cloud Computer Vision can Contribute to Growth of Assistive Technologies to Visually Impaired in the Following Years?. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 2(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.20897/jisem.201709
Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society. NY.: Free Press.
Foucault, M. (2005). It is necessary to protect society, St. Petersburg .: Nauka.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1990). The philosophy of law. - M., 524 p.
Ilyichev, L. F., Fedoseev, P. N., Kovalev, S. M., & Panov, V. G. (1983).
Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary. Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow, 893, 44.
Lebedev, A. B., & Gataullin, A. I. (2010). Social exclusion as a subject of psychoanalysis. Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 152(1).
Lebedev, A. B., & Farkhutdinov, L. I. (2013). Generic nature and global civilization: a crisis of key ideologists of the modern era. Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 155(1).
Marcuse, G. (2003). Eros and Civilization. One-dimensional person: a study of the ideology of an industrial society ". M. LLC" Publishing house AST .526 p.
Marcuse, G. (2003). One-dimensional man. A study of the ideology of a developed industrial society. M. https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/5440
Marx, K. (1844). Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm
Nerseyants, V. S. (1998). Hegel's Law Philosophy. M .: Yurist, 352 p.
O'Neill, J. (1968). Hegel and Marx on History as Human History. Akten des XIV. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, 2, 96-103.
Oveisi, K., Esmaeilimotlagh, M., Alizadeh, F., & Asadollahi Kheirabadi, M. (2018a). An Investigation on Coping Skills Training Effects on Mental Health Status of University Students. Journal of Humanities Insights, 02(01), 37-42.
Oveisi, K., Esmaeilimotlagh, M., Alizadeh, F., & Asadollahi Kheirabadi, M. (2018b). To Study the Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and its Comorbidity with personality disorders among veterans of Tehran. Journal of Humanities , 02(01), 06-13.
Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American journal of sociology, 33(6), 881-893.
Polyakov, V. I. (1990). Modern Western Sociology: Dictionary. - M.: Politizdat, 432 p.
Simmel, G. (1958). Philosophie des geldes (Vol. 1). Рипол Классик.
Sohrabi, M. (2017). The Relationship between Non-Financial Innovative Management Accounting Tools and Risk and Return of Iranian Stock Market Listed Companies. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 1(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.29333/djfm/5816
Stepanenko, R. F. (2014). Interdisciplinarity methodology in the general legal theory of marginality. Harmonization of approaches in research and teaching law. Zhidkov readings materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference. RUDN University; IGiP RAS. 560 p.
Stepanenko, R. F. (2015). General legal theory of marginality. Abstract dis. ... Dr. jur. Sciences.Kazan, 49 p.
Stepanenko, R. F. (2016). Socio-psychological and legal mechanisms for determining legal marginality. The State and Law, 5.
Stonequist, E. V. (1961). The marginal man: A study in personality and culture conflict.
Toffler, A. (1971). Future shock, 1970. See: https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Prosumer.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
