From Monarchy of Self-Holding- Zemesky to Self-Containing-Burocatic: Question of Russian Statehood Evolution in Early New Time
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i30.915Keywords:
early new time, political regime, bureaucracy, composite state, russian state, autocracy, absolutismAbstract
In this study, authors considered evolution of Russian statehood, the political regime, and relations of power, and society in the early new times, using the heuristic potential of concepts of "composite state" and "military revolution". Authors showed the need of external expansion in poverty conditions of Russian state which led to transform Russian monarchy from the autocratic-Zemstvo (where effective work of the state mechanism was ensured by cooperation of supreme power and local self-government) to the autocratic-bureaucratic monarchy (where supreme power rested primarily on bureaucracy and violence, reducing local government to a supporting role in public administration).
Downloads
References
Melgunov S.P. (1907) Church and State in Russia (on the issue of freedom of conscience). Moscow, Publishing House Partnership I.D. Sytin: 196. [In Russian].
Brewer, J. (1989) The sinews of power. War, money and the English state, 1688–1783. London, Unwin Hyman: 253.
Rethinking Leviathan: The Eighteenth-century State in Britain and Germany (1999). Eds. J. Brever and E. Hellmith. London-Oxford, Oxford University Press: 428.
Politics and Society in Reformation Europe (1987). Eds. Elton G., Kouri E., Scott T. London, Palgrave MacMillan: XIX. 568 r.
Tilly Ch. (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Oxford, Basil Blackwell: XI. 269.
Barkey K. (2008). Empire of Difference. The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 342.
Henshall, N. (1992) The Myth of Absolutism: Change & Continuity in the Early Modern European Monarchy. London & New York, Longman: 245.
Elliott, J. H. (1992) A Europe of Composite Monarchies // Past & Present. Number 137. The Cultural and Political Construction of Europe: 48-71.
Koenigsberger, H. G. (1978). Dominium Regale or Dominium Politicum et Regale // Theory and Society. Vol. 5. 2: 191-217.
MacKenney R. (2002). Sixteenth Century Europe. Expansion and Conflict. London, Palgrave Macmillane: 425.
Parker G. (1988). The Military Revolution. Military innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500-1800. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 234.
Parker G. (1976). The “Military Revolution,” 1560-1660 - a Myth? // The Journal of Modern History. Vol. 48. No. 2 (Jun., 1976): 195-214.
Roberts M. (1967). The Military Revolution, 1560-1660 // Roberts M. Essays in Swedish History. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson: 195-225.
Kollmann N.S. (1999). By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia. Ithaka & London, Cornell University Press: 312.
Gennady A. Borisov, Vladimir G. Krikun, Victoria V. Kutko, Vitaly V. Penskoy & Svetlana V. Sherstobitova (2017). Comparative Law Analysis // Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 10, No. 3: 121-124.
T.I. Lipich, V.V. Lipich, V.V. Penskoy and T.M. Penskaya (2016). The Reign of Ivan the Terrible: From “Patrimonial State” to “Composite Monarchy” // The Social Sciences. Volume 11. Issue 10: 2421-2424.
Renskaya, T., Zajcev, V., Podgornyj, V., Shabalina, E., & Potapov, V. (2017). Moscow Autocracy of the XVI - XVII Centuries: Eastern arch ’Despotism’ ’or An Early Modern European Monarchy? // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. # 6 (3): 1190-1198.
The first message to Kurbsky (2005) // Messages from Ivan the Terrible. St. Petersburg, Science: 9-71.
Baranov K.V. (2004). Notebook of the Polotsk campaign of 1562/1563 // Russian diplomatary. M .: Ancient storage: 119-154.
Matandare, M. A. (2018). Botswana Unemployment Rate Trends by Gender: Relative Analysis with Upper Middle Income Southern African Countries (2000-2016). Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2(2), 04.
Chrome MM (2010) “The Dowager Kingdom”: The Political Crisis in Russia of the 30s – 40s of the 16th Century. Moscow, New Literary Review: 888.
