Harm compensation issues after a terrorist act by russian law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i27.819Keywords:
Terrorism, terrorism prevention, national security, human rights, compensation for harm.Abstract
The experience of international regulation of security issues almost forms the basis for the legal regulation of national law in the cases where the problems of the relationship between an individual and a state are characterized by critical problems arising from the spread of terrorism. States consider the problems of protection from terrorism as actually formed ones, that is, the availability of information about the actions of groups of terrorists, the facts and the criminal links related to terrorist acts, as well as direct terrorist attacks that occurred on the territory of countries. States apply various forms of combat with terrorism uniformly, including generally recognized models of proclaiming in constitutions or in other acts the legitimate duty of the state to respect and protect human rights, the inviolability of an individual, and the guarantee of life, health and freedom safety. In reality, the opportunities of a state are not realized fully on their own, as the authorities themselves recognize their inability to solve the problem of terrorism unilaterally, spreading additional "burden" on the introduction of specific actions on the part of citizens, public organizations, civil society institutions and local bodies for terrorist act prevention. Today we have to admit that the problem of terrorism will not be completely eradicated and in the short term it is necessary to have a comprehensive legal regulation to counteract terrorism, including the reparation to terrorist victimsDownloads
References
Fahmy, W. (2017). Some legal aspects of the justice against sponsors of terrorism act. BRICS LAW JOURNAL. Volume IV. Issue 1. P. 56.
Avdeev, V., Avdeeva, O., Rozenko, S., Znamerovskiy, E., Kiselyov, E. (20170. Crime Of The Terrorist Character And Extremist Orientation In The Russian Federation: State And Measures Of Counteraction. Journal Of Security And Sustainability Issues. December Volume 7 Number 2. P. 361.
Bonino, S. (2016). The British state ‘security syndrome’ and Muslim diversity: challenges for liberal democracy in the age of terror. Cont Islam. pp. 230-232
Muskhanova, I. V., Zyryanova, I. V., Kurdyumov, V. I., Pugacheva, A. S., Shaidullina, A. R. (2016). The Essential Characteristic of Safety as a Category of Right. International Journal of Environmental &Science Education, Vol. 11, No.10, p. 3756.
Ladislav, H. (2012). Wstęp do studiów bezpieczeństwa. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM. p. 57.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement Guðmundur S. Alfreðsson, Asbjørn Eide Martinus. Nijhoff Publishers, (1999). pp. 89-90.
Akimzhanov, T., Amandykova, S., Ashimova, E., Karzhaubayev, E., Smatlayev, B. (2016). Actual Aspects of Counteraction to Terrorism in Modem Conditions. The Social Sciences 11 (8), p. 1566.
Federal Law No. 35-FL "On Counteracting Terrorism" issued on 06.03.2006 (as amended on 18.04.2018) // Reference and Legal System "ConsultantPlus". URL: www.consultant.ru
Kokoyeva, L. T., Rybakov, V. A., Soloviev, V. N., Trushin, S. A. (2009). Civil-law mechanism for the compensation of damage caused by the act of terrorism: Monograph. Moscow, p. 78.
Sklovsky, K., Smirnova, M. (2003). On compensation of damage caused as the result of a terrorist act. Economy and law. No. 6. p. 99.
