The regulations of agreement between defense and prosecution in criminal procedure: State and development perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i27.817Keywords:
criminal justice, contractual regulation, criminal process party, prosecution, defense simplified prAbstract
The problem of current criminal procedural legislation improvement still retains a high degree of urgency. And one of the promising trends of such a development is the clarification of contractual regulation place and content in the field of criminal justice and, accordingly, the optimization of its parameters, which acquires a special significance in the context of a number of negative criminal trends development in Russian Federation, forming the prerequisites for their localization and overcoming. The specificity of a current criminal situation and the alarming forecasts of its development predetermine the activity of society and the state in search of optimal ways to increase the efficiency of criminal proceedings, also by improving the norms that support the existence and the actual content of contractual relations in criminal proceedings. Negative trends in crime and the declining of clear-up rate reveal that traditional, established legal institutions aimed at the elimination of the criminal-legal conflict between the state and the person who committed the crime, as well as its causes, can not always be applied effectively and require qualitatively different approaches to solve this problem, the introduction of new procedures to stop the expansion of crimeDownloads
References
Matkina, D. V. (2010). Conventional form of legal proceedings: history, current situation and development prospects: monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform, p. 216.
Bakulina, L. T. (2017). The means of contractual legal regulation. Actual problems of Russian law. No. 5 (78). pp. 158-166.
Abshilava, G. V. (2012). Conciliation proceedings in the criminal proceedings of Russian Federation: monograph. Ed. by O.A. Zaitsev. Moscow: Yurlitinform, p. 456.
Baev, O. Ya. (2013). Pre-judicial cooperation agreement: legal and forensic problems, possible trends for their resolution: monograph. M.: Norma, Infra-M, p. 208.
Albert, W. (2018). Alschuler. Plea Bargaining and Its History. Columbia Law Review. URL: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 2005&context=journal_articles (дата обращения: 15.06.2018); Albert W. Alschuler. PLEA BARGAINING AND THE DEATH PENALTY // DePaul Law Review. URL: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1227&context=law-review (дата обращения: 15.06.2018).
Bibas, S. (2016). Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up: Accuracy and Fairness Without Trials as Backstops. William & Mary Law Review. Volume 57. Issue 4. pp. 1055-1081.
Crespo, A. M. (2018). The Hidden Law of Plea Bargaining. Columbia Law Review. Volume 118. No. 5. pp. 1303-1424.
Daftary-Kapur, T., Zottoli, T. M. (2014). A First Look at the Plea Deal Experiences of Juveniles Tried in Adult Court. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. Volume 13. Issue 4. pp. 323-336.
Brandon, L. (2016). Garrett. Why Plea Bargains are Not Confessions. William & Mary Law Review. Volume 57. Issue 4. pp. 1415-1444.
Richard, L. (2018). Lippke. Plea Bargaining in the Shadow of the Constitution. Duquesne University Law Review. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319058 (дата обращения: 16.06.2018).
Sangero, B. (2018). Safety from Plea-Bargains’ Hazards. Pace law review. Volume 38. Issue 2. pp. 301-337.
Verin, A. Y., Antonov, I. O., Klyukova, M. E., Rahmatullin, R. R. (2016). Some problems in application of certain forms of summary procedure based on criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Volume 19. Special Issue. pp. 25-30.
