The Right To Respect For Family Life: Legal Basis For State Interference

Authors

  • Nataliya O. Davydova
  • Olena R. Dashkovska
  • Marija V. Mendzhul
  • Olga A. Yavor
  • Tetiana S. Khokhlova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i44.1579

Keywords:

family life, private life, European Court of Human Rights, state, grounds for interference

Abstract

This article is dedicated to a theoretical and legal study of the concept of "the right to respect for family life". It is based on legal analysis of Ukrainian legislation and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. It has been argued that the legal bases for state interference in family life are: 1) interference committed under the law, 2) interference with the interests of the majority in a democratic society, 3) interference to prevent disorder, crime, health, morality , rights and freedoms of other citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barberić, L., Čolak, D., & Dolmagić, J. (2015). Prosecuting War Crimes and Meeting Obligations under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms at the Same Time–the Case of Croatia. Croatian International Relations Review, 21(74), 41–61.

Bendiksen, L. R. (2019). Children’s Constitutional Right to Respect for Family Life in Norway: Words or Real Effect? In Children’s Constitutional Rights in the Nordic Countries (pp. 317–337). Brill Nijhoff.

Berkaw, A. (2011). Presumed Guilty: How the European Court Handles Criminal Libel Cases in Violation of Article 6 (2) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Colum. J. Transnat’l L., 50, 774.

Breen, C., Krutzinna, J., Luhamaa, K., & Skivenes, M. (2020). Family Life for Children in State Care: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ Reasoning on Adoption Without Consent. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 1(aop), 1–33.

Brems, E. (2005). Conflicting Human Rights: An Exploration in the Context of the Right to a Fair Trial in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Human Rights Quarterly, 294–326.

Cherednychenko, O. O. (2007). Fundamental rights and private law: A relationship of subordination or complementarity. Utrecht L. Rev., 3, 1.

Coblentz, W. K., & Warshaw, R. S. (1956). European convention for the Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Calif. L. Rev., 44, 94.

Davies, B. (2012). Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany’s Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979. Cambridge University Press.

Freeland, C. (2015). My Ukraine: A Personal Reflection on a Nation’s Independence and the Nightmare Vladimir Putin Has Visited Upon It. Brookings Institution Press.

Futey, B. A. (1997). Comments on the Law on the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. E. Eur. Const. Rev., 6, 56.

Hanna, A. L. (2019). A Constitutional Right to Appointed Counsel for the Children of America’s Refugee Crisis. Harv. CR-CLL Rev., 54, 257.

Hey, E., & Kessedjian, C. (2000). Judgment of the First Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania(request no. 31679/96), January 25, 2000. International Law FORUM Du Droit International, 2(2), 71–72.

HRCD, I. (1997). Gnahore v. France.

Hubanov, O., Hubanova, T., & Yara, O. (2018). Legal Regulation Of Adaptation Of The National Legislation Of Ukraine To The Eu Legislation (Acquis Communautaire) In The Field Of Public Service. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 93–98.

Isaksson, A. (2019). Religious dress and the rights of others–an analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Katrenko, A. (2018). Problematic questions determining category of “interest” in civil law of Ukraine. Jurnalul Juridic National: Teorie Şi Practică, 32(4–2), 85–87.

Kaya, R. (2020). European court of human rights on addressing environmental discrimination against collectivities. The Lawyer Quarterly, 9(4).

Keller, H. (2005). Reception of the European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) in Poland and Switzerland. Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht, 65, 2005.

Kerson, D. L. A. (1961). The European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Calif. L. Rev., 49, 172.

Khudyk, A. (2019). Constitutionalization of public finances through the prism of decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. VISEGRAD JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS, 226.

Lautenbach, G. (2013). The concept of the rule of law and the European Court of Human Rights. OUP Oxford.

Levochkin, M. (2016). Problems of public-private partnership in Ukraine and ways of solving them. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2(2).

McMichael, A. J., Potter, J. D., & Hetzel, B. S. (1979). Time trends in colo-rectal cancer mortality in relation to food and alcohol consumption: United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 8(4), 295–304.

Mykhailov, O., Hryb, A., & Riaboshapchenko, A. (2020). Involuntary termination of private property rights under the civil legislation of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 9(27), 62–71.

Pankevych, I., & Sofinska, I. (2019). The Constitutional Court of Ukraine as the main actor in safeguarding of the Constitution. Juridical Tribune Journal= Tribuna Juridica, 9, 77–92.

Reznichenko, S. V., Herasymchuk, L. V., & Shemonayev, С. V. (2019). General characteristics and types of proprietary rights on another’s property (iura in re aliena) in civil legislation of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 453–458.

Roagna, I. (2012). Protecting the right to respect for private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (Vol. 24). Council of Europe Strasbourg.

Safonchyk, O., Hlyniana, K., & Ennan, R. (2020). Current Issues of Recodification of Civil Legislation of Ukraine in the Context of European Integration Processese. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 303–310.

Sychenko, E., & Chernyaeva, D. (2019). The Impact of the ECHR on Employee’s Privacy Protection. Italian Labour Law E-Journal, 12(2), 171–188.

Thym, D. (2008). Respect for private and family life under Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases: A human right to regularize illegal stay? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 87–112.

Trochev, A. (2003). Ukraine: Constitutional court invalidates ban on Communist Party. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(3), 534–540.

TROCHEV, Alexe. (2009). The Constitutional Court of Ukraine.

Trykhlib, K. (2019). Law-Making Activity in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. International and Comparative Law Review, 19(2), 27–75.

Wnukiewicz-Kozlowska, A. (2020). The Right to Privacy and Medical Confidentiality–Some Remarks in Light of ECHR Case Law. Bialostockie Studia Prawnicze, 25(2), 185–197.

Wolczuk, K. (2002). 14. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine: The Politics of Survival. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective, 62, 327.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-26

How to Cite

O. Davydova, N., R. Dashkovska, O., V. Mendzhul, M., A. Yavor, O., & S. Khokhlova, T. (2021). The Right To Respect For Family Life: Legal Basis For State Interference. Revista San Gregorio, 1(44). https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i44.1579