The Role of the Constitutional Court in the Implementation of the Principle of Checks and Balances System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i42.1558Keywords:
Constitutional Doctrine, Constitutional Justice, System of Checks and Balances, The Principle of SepAbstract
The article deals with the analysis of the place and role of the Constitutional Court in the system of separation of powers, for the effective implementation of the system of checks and balances. The institutional and legal model of interaction of constitutional justice authorities with legislative and executive bodies is formulated on the basis of the comparative legal analysis of the regulatory legal acts establishing the powers of constitutional jurisdiction authorities in the mechanism of implementation of the system of checks and balances on the example of different countries with different forms of government, a number of conclusions and suggestions are provided.
Downloads
References
Albert, R. (2017). Introduction: The State of the Art in Constitutional Amendment. In R. Albert, X. Contiades, & A. Fotiadou (Eds.), The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bentsen, H. L., Mark, J., & Skiple, J. K. (2019). Confronting SKAT in the Højesteret: An Investigation into how EU Law, Precedent, Litigant Resources, and Structural Reform shape Tax Decisions. UCHP Fiscal Relations Law Journal, 1(1), 1-30.
Bielen, S., Peeters, L., Marneffe, W., & Vereeck, L. (2018). Backlogs and Litigation Rates: Testing Congestion Equilibrium across European Judiciaries. International Review of Law and Economics, 53, 9-22.
Blagojević, A. (2017). Procedures Regarding National Identity Clause in the National Constitutional Courtʹs and the CJEUʹs Case-law. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges, 1, 210-237;
Bricker, B. (2017). Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts. Law and Policy, 39, 170-191.
Bricker, B., & Wondreys, J. (2018). Public Opinion and Opposition Party Success: Evidence from the European Constitutional Courts. Justice System Journal, 39, 123-138.
Britannica. (2019). Checks and balances. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/checks-and-balances
Cloots, E. (2016). National Identity, Constitutional Identity and Sovereignty in the EU. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45(2), 83-84. https://doi.org/10.5553/njlp/.000049
Garoupa, N. (2020). Constitutional Courts in Civil-Law Western Europe: Quantitative Approaches. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper, 20-05. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537747
Goldstein, R. (2020). Secretary of the Commonwealth. Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/goldstein-v-secy-commonwealth
Halmai, G. (2017). The Hungarian Constitutional Court and Constitutional Identity. Verfassungsblog. Retrieved from https://verfassungsblog.de/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-and-constitutional-identity/
Halmai, G. (2018). Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law. Review of Central and East European Law, 43(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352- 04301002
Kosař, D., & Vyhnánek, L. (2020). Constitutional Identity in the Czech Republic. In C. Calliess & G. van der Schyff (Eds.), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256.005.
Meyer, P. (2019). Judicial Public Relations: Determinants of Press Release Publication by Constitutional Courts. Retrieved from https://phimeyer.github.io/publication/2019a-Meyer
Mollers, C. (2013). The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pellegrina, L. D., Garoupa N., & Gómez-Pomar, F. (2017). Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The Case of Administrative Review. International Review of Law and Economics, 52, 16-28.
Pellegrina, L. D., Garoupa, N., & Saldaña, M. G. (2018). A Study on Judicial Ideal Points in a Bidimensional Court. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3100214
Petriv , I. (2020). Practical aspects of the implementation by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of functional powers in the mechanism of state authority. Scientific Papers of the Legislation Institute of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 4, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.32886/instzak.2020.04.13
Phelan, W. (2020). The Role of the German and Italian Constitutional Courts in the Rise of EU Human Rights Jurisprudence: A Response to Delledonne & Fabbrini. TRiSS Working Paper Series TRiSS-WPS-02-2020. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3617248
Pildes, R. H. (2020a). The Supreme Court’s Wisconsin Decision and the Universal Policy that Absentee Ballots Must be Cast (Postmarked) On or Before Election Day. Election Law Blog. Retrieved from https://electionlawblog.org/?p=110474
Pildes, R. H., (2020b). The Constitutional Emergency Powers of Federal Courts. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3629356
Pócza, K., & Dobos, G. (2019). Research Methodology. In K. Pócza (Ed.), Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary: Decision-Making in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 8-31). London: Routledge.
Reutter, W. (2020). Subnational constitutional courts and judicialization in Germany. European Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00293-8
Sadurski, W. (2014). Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sweet, A. S. (2012). Constitutional Courts. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199578610-e-40
Wendel, M., Reestman, J. H., & Claes, M. (2020). Better In Than Out: When Constitutional Courts Rely on the Charter. European Constitutional Law Review, 16(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000061
