Aesthetics of Interactions by Nicolas Bourriaud in the View of Criticism and Search for an Alternative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i41.1494Keywords:
culture, modern art, aesthetics of interaction, understanding, nicolas bourriaud, evocation of alterAbstract
Art critics and artists conduct an intensive search in defining the tasks of artistic creation. Culture is undergoing a major shift in the field of modern art towards social interaction. What achievements have been made in the field of social art, as defined in the aesthetics of the interactions of "? How does critical thought develop in contemporary foreign art? What are the requirements of the art practices of critics Miwon Kwon, Maria Lind, Claire Bishop? In order to answer these questions, the authors examine the works of social artists, as well as the writings of critics, in which an alternative to the views of N. Bourriaud is expressed.
Downloads
References
Alternative or affirmation: Ksenia Vasilieva on "aesthetics of relationships and its criticism" //URL: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/7911-relational-aesthetics.
Bazileva, I. (2007). Can contemporary art become modern?. Art magazine, 109-111.
Bishop, C. (2004). Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics, 110, 51–79.
Bishop, C. (2005). The Social turn in contemporary art. Moscow Art magazine, 58-59. URL: http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/58-59/povorot/
Bourriaud, N. (1998). Relacional Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du reel, (2002 for the English translation) 128 p.
Davis, M. (2006). City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. Verso; New Editionedition, 441 p.
Epishin, A. (2017). Phenomenon of contemporary art. On the question of definition. Art and Literature Scientific and Analytical Journal TEXTS, 3, 72‒79.
Epishin, A. Ibid. Р. 72‒79.
Eshe, C. (2005). Modest Suggestions and Reckless Optimism. Art Journal, 58-59, 6-8.
Foster, H. et al. (2015). Art since 1900: modernism, anti-modernism, postmodernism. under the editorship of A. Fomenko, A. Shestakova. М.: GARAGE x AdMarginem, 816 p.
Gombrich, E. (2017). Art History. M.: Art-XXI century, 688 p.
Gui Debord. (1967). La Societѐ du Spectacle. – URL: http://solutions-politiques.over- blog.com/pages/1_Guy_DEBORD_La_Societe_du_Spectacle_1967_Chapitres_1_a_3-3346776.html
Korsmeyer, С. (2019). A Tour of the Senses. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 59(4), 357–371, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayz026
Kwon, М. (1997). For Hamburg: Public Art and Urban Identities. Public Art is Everywhere, Hamburg, 95-109. – URL: http://www.propublicart.ru/publication?id=11
Lind, M. (2015). Turn to Collaboration. Logos.. V.25. P.88-121.
Lynch, K. (1982). The image of the city. translated from English by V.L. Glazychev. М.: Stroiizdat, 328p.
Maslyaev, A.I., Annurova, O., & Liderman, I. The Art of Misunderstanding. URL: https://theatrummundi.ru/material/incomprehension
Nancy, J.-L. (2009). Unproductive community: New edition, revised and supplemented. Translated from French J. Gorbyleva and E. Troitsky. М.: Vodolei, 208 p.
Sekatsky, A.K. (2013).Two caskets, turquoise and jade: Translation and publication of St. Petersburg: Limbus Press, K.Tublin Publishing House, 240p.
Spector, N., Conzalez-Torres, F., & Solomon, R. (2007). Guggenheim Museum, NYC, 232 p.
Stein, S. Yu. (2017). Methodology in art criticism. Decorative art and object-spatial environment. Gerald of MGHPA, 1(4), 32-46.
Taylor, B. (2006). ART TODAY: Contemporary Art 1970 – 2005. Brandon Taylor; translated from English. E. D. Melenevskaya. М.: Slovo,. 256 p.
