Management mechanisms in the context of digitization of all spheres of society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i42.1535Palabras clave:
public policy, digitalization, modernization, digital gap.Resumen
Digitalization transforms public policy. It forms new models of public administration based on knowledge about the behavior of social groups. This study experimentally confirms the lack of impact of e-government and digitalization on the quality of life. It is proved that the new state policy is not aimed at ensuring socio-economic well-being, but the management of the collective consciousness of the masses. The economic benefits of digitization are insignificant. Digital policy provides a greater level of transparency in order to obtain its own benefits: the development of public-private partnerships, attracting investment in digital infrastructure, openness of digital governance.The article proves that the modernization of public policy under the influence of digitalization forms a new era of digital leadership,
Citas
Akimov, O., Karpa, M., Parkhomenko-Kutsevil, O., Kupriichuk, V., & Omarov, A. (2020). Entrepreneurship education of the formation of the e-commerce managers professional qualities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 23(1).
Björklund, F. (2016). E-government and moral citizenship: the case of Estonia. Citizen ship studies, 20(6-7), 914-931.
Calista, D. J., Melitski, J., Holzer, M., & Manoharan, A. (2010). Digitized government in world wide municipalities between 2003 and 2007. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12-13), 588-600.
Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(1-2), 1-9.
De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2016). Why choose open government? Motivations for the adoption of open government policies in four European countries. Policy & Internet, 8(3), 225-247.
European Commission. (2020). DESI composite index. Retrieved from https://digital-agenda-data.eu/charts/desi-composite#chart={"indicator":"desi_sliders","breakdown":{"desi_1_conn":5,"desi_2_hc":5,"desi_3_ui":3,"desi_4_idt":4,"desi_5_dps":3},"unit-measure":"pc_desi_sliders","time-period":"2020"}
Faisal, M. N., & Talib, F. (2016). E-government to m-government: a study in a developing economy. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 14(6), 568-592.
Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policy making: fad or fast track?. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367-382.
Heeks, R., (2001). Understanding e-Governance for Development. iGovernment Working Paper, 11. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3540058
Henriksen, H. Z. (2018). One step forward and two steps back: e-Government policies in practice. In Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics (pp. 79-97). Cham: Springer.
Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236.
Katz, R. L., & Koutroumpis, P. (2012). Measuring socio-economic digitization: A paradigm shift. Retrieved from http://www.teleadvs.com/wp-content/uploads/Measuring-socio-economic-digitization.pdf
Katz, R. L., & Koutroumpis, P. (2013). Measuring digitization: A growth and welfare multiplier. Technovation, 33(10-11), 314-319.
Leviäkangas, P., Paik, S. M., & Moon, S. (2017). Keeping up with the pace of digitization: The case of the Australian construction industry. Technology in Society, 50, 33-43.
Morganti, L., Donders, K., Katz, R., Koutroumpis, P., & Callorda, F. M. (2014). Using a digitization index to measure the economic and social impact of digitalagendas. Info, 16(1), 32-44.
Reddick, C. G., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Determinants of citizens’ mobile apps future use in Chinese local governments: An analysis of survey data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2016-0078
Sabbagh, K., Friedrich, R., El-Darwiche, B., Singh, M., Ganediwalla, S., & Katz, R. (2012). Maximizing the impact of digitization. The global information technology report. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR/2012/GITR_Chapter1.11_2012.pdf
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018). On approval of the Concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018-2020 and approval of the action plan for its implementation. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/67-2018-%D1%80
World Bank. (2016). Digital Adoption Index. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016/Digital-Adoption-Index
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
